Calculator
Liquid Limit Calculator
Liquid limit by log interpolation between two Casagrande trials.
- Liquid limit
- 48.4 %
- at 25 blows
Live statistics
48.4 %
16.3
Lower blow count.
Under 25.
Higher blow count.
Above 25.
How you compare — standard sections
| Section | Depth (mm) | Mass (kg/m) | A (cm²) | Iₓ (×10⁶ mm⁴) | Sₓ (×10³ mm³) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UB 305×165×40 · Steel I-beam | 304 | 40.3 | 51.3 | 85 | 560 |
| UB 457×191×67 · Steel I-beam | 454 | 67.1 | 85.5 | 294 | 1290 |
| UC 254×254×73 · Steel column | 254 | 73.1 | 93.1 | 114 | 895 |
| RC 300×500 (C30) · Concrete beam | 500 | 375 | 1500 | 3125 | 12500 |
| Glulam 140×450 · Timber beam | 450 | 29 | 630 | 1063 | 4725 |
| SHS 200×200×8 · Hollow section | 200 | 47.4 | 60.4 | 36.9 | 369 |
Indicative values for scheme design only. Always verify against the manufacturer / code tables (AISC Steel Manual, SCI Blue Book, ACI detailing) before ordering steel or pouring concrete.
Plans & details
Borehole log sketch
Strata, SPT N, water strikes and sampling depths per the ground investigation.
Lab phase sketch
Weights, volumes and Atterberg limits that classify and rate the soil.
Site verification
Proof-test bearing soils, confirm water levels and keep formations protected.
Typical details for scheme design. Replace placeholders with project drawings (1200×630 JPG or SVG line work in /public/plans/civil/). Do not scale from web images — use figured dimensions.
Design verification checklist
Work through before issuing results — 1/6 verified (17%).
Results
Liquid limit LL
48.4%
w at 25 blows.
16.3%/log
Slope of the flow line.
Visualizations
Results Overview
Formula
Water content falls linearly with log blows; the line is read where it crosses 25 blows.
Alternative Form
Variables
| Symbol | Name | Unit | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| LL | Liquid limit | % | Boundary of liquid behaviour. |
| IF | Flow index | % | Steepness of the flow line. |
| N | Blow count | - | Casagrande cup blows. |
Explanation
Semi-log interpolation of the Casagrande flow line.
Derivation
Two-point form of the semi-log flow line evaluated at N = 25.
Step-by-Step Calculation
Follow each step to understand how the result is calculated from your inputs.
Enter a soft trial under 25 blows
Enter a firm trial above 25
Read LL at 25 blows
Worked Examples
See how the calculator works with different scenarios.
Scenario
52 percent at 15, 46 at 35 blows.
Inputs
Calculation
IF is 6/0.368 = 16.3, LL is 52 - 3.6 = 48.4 percent.
Result
LL = 48.4 %
Interpretation
Medium-high plasticity; run a third trial to confirm.
Understanding Your Result
Your Result: Liquid limit LL = 48.4 % · Flow index = 16.3 %/log
Typical range: Silts 25 to 40; clays 40 to 80 percent.
What This Means
Water content where the soil just starts to flow.
Why It Matters
LL anchors PI, classification and compressibility.
Professional Interpretation
Report trials, IF and LL with the device used.
Recommendations
- •Pair every strength with its water content and density
- •Confirm critical values with project lab testing
- •Verify one line by hand per calculation sheet
Learn — structural behaviour, deeply
Two trials, one log line, 25 blows.
1 · The two equations that run every site
ΣF_y = 0
Vertical balance
Upward reactions must equal total downward load. Missing 1 kN here means a 1 kN shear error everywhere downstream.
ΣM = 0
Moment balance
Moments about ANY point must cancel. Take moments about one support to eliminate it and solve the other directly.
ΣF_x = 0
Horizontal balance
Zero for vertical-only loading — but the pin still needs checking once wind, soil or inclined loads appear.
2 · Support types — what each one can (and cannot) do
| Support | Reactions | Allows | Watch out |
|---|---|---|---|
| Roller | 1 (vertical) | Horizontal slide + rotation | Provides NO lateral restraint — pair with a pin or bracing. |
| Pin / hinge | 2 (vertical + horizontal) | Rotation only | Moment released here — detail the hinge, never weld it rigid by accident. |
| Fixed / clamped | 3 (+ moment) | Nothing (fully restrained) | Attracts large moments; settlement or temperature causes locked-in stress. |
| Propped cantilever | 3 (indeterminate ×1) | Rotation at prop | Needs compatibility (deflection = 0 at prop) — equilibrium alone is not enough. |
| Continuous (3+ supports) | 4+ (indeterminate) | Rotation over interior piers | Solve by superposition / moment distribution / software; reactions shift with stiffness. |
3 · Factor-impact table — what moves your reactions most
| Factor | Typical impact | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Load position (a/L) | Linear, dominant | Moving P toward a support shifts ~100% of P onto it. Ra = P·(L−a)/L — position matters more than span. |
| UDL intensity (w) | ∝ w·L total | Each extra 1 kN/m on a 6 m beam adds 3 kN per reaction. Self-weight alone is often 1–5 kN/m on concrete. |
| Span length (L) | ∝ L for UDL | Doubling L doubles UDL reactions and quadruples UDL moment (wL²/8). Keep spans tight where possible. |
| Overhang length (c) | ∝ c/L uplift | Uplift at the far support = P·c/L. A 2 m overhang with 10 kN on a 5 m span pulls down 4 kN — needs hold-down. |
| Fixity (pinned → fixed) | Redistributes ~10–30% | Fixed ends attract moment and shed midspan moment. Never assume fixity you have not detailed. |
| Support settlement (Δ) | 0 (det.) / large (indet.) | Determinate beams just rotate; continuous/fixed beams develop locked-in moments ≈ 3EIΔ/L². |
| Dynamic / impact | +10–100% | Static reactions must be amplified for cranes, machinery, footfall (see ASCE 7 Ch. 4, AISC DG11). |
| Load combination | × 1.2–1.6 (LRFD) | 1.2D + 1.6L + 0.5(Lr/S/R) governs most beams. Reactions for strength ≠ reactions for service checks. |
4 · Code provisions you must cite on drawings
- ASCE 7 load combinations (LRFD): 1.4D · 1.2D + 1.6L + 0.5(Lr/S/R) · 1.2D + 1.0W + 1.0L … Strength reactions use factored loads; bearing/deflection checks use service (unfactored) loads.
- ACI 318 (concrete): strength-reduction ϕ = 0.65–0.90; development/lap lengths Ch. 25; one-way shear + punching Ch. 22. Reactions feed directly into Vu ≤ ϕVn.
- AISC 360 (steel): Ch. F/G/H for moment/shear/combined; bearing at supports per J7–J8; bracing per App. 6. Connection must develop the computed reaction — a beam is only as strong as its seat.
- Eurocode basis (EN 1990): ULS 1.35G + 1.5Q; SLS G + Q (characteristic). National annexes adjust factors — confirm the project annex.
- Serviceability (all codes): live-load deflection ≈ L/360 floors, L/240 roofs; total ≈ L/240. Vibration: AISC DG11 / SCI P354 for rhythmic or office floors.
5 · Pro workflow (5 minutes per beam)
- Sketch the free-body diagram: every load incl. self-weight, every support, dimensions.
- Solve ΣM then ΣF — write both lines on the calc sheet so a checker can follow.
- Verify: re-take moments about the OTHER support; residual must be ≈ 0.
- Draw shear then moment (reactions are the SFD starting values).
- Size the support: bearing stress, padstone, bolt/weld group, foundation pressure.
- File: keep the input → reaction → SFD/BMD → support chain on one page.
6 · Field traps (where reactions go wrong)
- • Forgetting self-weight: a 300×600 concrete beam weighs 4.5 kN/m — on 6 m that is 13.5 kN per support.
- • Assuming fixity: a “fixed” sketch with two bolts is a pin. Model what you detail.
- • Ignoring uplift: overhang + wind can reverse a bearing — light roofs lift off.
- • Mixing factored/service: never compare a factored reaction against an allowable soil pressure.
- • Point load at the wrong station: 0.5 m error on a 10 kN load swings reactions by P·Δa/L.
7 · The 3-check rule (sign-off standard)
- Math check: ΣFy and ΣM both close to zero with project units printed.
- Sanity check: reactions sum to total load; heavier side sits under heavier load; UDL symmetry gives Ra ≈ Rb.
- Load-path check: every reaction lands on something sized for it — beam → seat → column → footing → soil, no floating numbers.
Practical Tips
- •Split dead vs live early — factoring depends on it
- •Include self-weight; concrete often dominates
- •Report service values to 1 decimal for bearings and footings
Common Mistakes
Assumptions
This calculator makes the following assumptions to provide estimates:
Limitations
Be aware of these limitations when using this calculator:
Frequently Asked Questions
Answers to common questions about this calculator.
Why bracket 25?
Cone instead?
Is this final?
How do I find reactions for a simply supported beam?
What does a negative (downward) reaction mean?
Do I include the beam self-weight?
Service vs factored loads — which do I report?
What is the difference between a UDL and a UVL?
How do I turn a floor area load into a beam line load?
What is tributary area?
Which load combination usually governs a beam?
LRFD vs ASD — does it change the reactions?
Pin, roller or fixed — how do I choose the support model?
What deflection limits apply to beams?
How do I convert kN ↔ kips and m ↔ ft?
Shear vs bending moment — which sizes what?
Where does the maximum moment occur?
What is section modulus and how do I use it?
How do I quickly check a steel beam?
How do I quickly check a concrete beam?
What is development length and why does it matter?
Related Calculators
Explore more calculators related to this topic.
Glossary
Technical terms used in mortgage calculations explained in plain language.
- Reaction
- Force (or moment) a support exerts on a member to maintain static equilibrium (ΣF = 0, ΣM = 0).
- Simply supported
- Beam on one pin + one roller. Resists vertical load; allows rotation and (at roller) horizontal movement.
- Fixed support
- Clamped end resisting force AND moment; prevents rotation. Used in cantilevers and fixed frames.
- UDL / UVL
- Uniformly distributed load (constant kN/m) vs. uniformly varying load (triangular, zero-to-max).
- Tributary area
- Floor/roof area whose load drains to one member. Line load = area load × tributary width.
- Factored load
- Service load × LRFD load factor (e.g. 1.2D + 1.6L) for strength design per ASCE 7.
- Serviceability
- Deflection, cracking and vibration limits under day-to-day (unfactored) loads.
- Uplift
- Net downward-hold requirement: a negative (downward-pulling) reaction, common on overhangs.
Authoritative References
Trusted sources and standards referenced by this calculator.
Applicable Standards
Was This Calculator Helpful?
Page Information
2026-09-28
2.0.0
Free to use for educational and professional purposes.