Calculator
Vesic Bearing Capacity Calculator
Vesic capacity with shape and depth factors.
- Allowable qa
- 517 kPa
- Vesic FS split
Live statistics
1552 kPa
517 kPa
Effective phi.
Effective cohesion.
Below base.
Short side.
Long side.
Base depth.
Usually 3.
How you compare — standard sections
| Section | Depth (mm) | Mass (kg/m) | A (cm²) | Iₓ (×10⁶ mm⁴) | Sₓ (×10³ mm³) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UB 305×165×40 · Steel I-beam | 304 | 40.3 | 51.3 | 85 | 560 |
| UB 457×191×67 · Steel I-beam | 454 | 67.1 | 85.5 | 294 | 1290 |
| UC 254×254×73 · Steel column | 254 | 73.1 | 93.1 | 114 | 895 |
| RC 300×500 (C30) · Concrete beam | 500 | 375 | 1500 | 3125 | 12500 |
| Glulam 140×450 · Timber beam | 450 | 29 | 630 | 1063 | 4725 |
| SHS 200×200×8 · Hollow section | 200 | 47.4 | 60.4 | 36.9 | 369 |
Indicative values for scheme design only. Always verify against the manufacturer / code tables (AISC Steel Manual, SCI Blue Book, ACI detailing) before ordering steel or pouring concrete.
Plans & details
Borehole log sketch
Strata, SPT N, water strikes and sampling depths per the ground investigation.
Lab phase sketch
Weights, volumes and Atterberg limits that classify and rate the soil.
Site verification
Proof-test bearing soils, confirm water levels and keep formations protected.
Typical details for scheme design. Replace placeholders with project drawings (1200×630 JPG or SVG line work in /public/plans/civil/). Do not scale from web images — use figured dimensions.
Design verification checklist
Work through before issuing results — 1/6 verified (17%).
Results
Ultimate qult
1552kPa
Vesic superposition.
517kPa
Service design value.
18.4 / 30.1 / 20.1-
Vesic set, depth dq 1.217.
Visualizations
Results Overview
Formula
Vesic streamlines the factor family with the widely coded N-gamma and arctangent depth rule.
Alternative Form
Variables
| Symbol | Name | Unit | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ng | Weight factor | - | Vesic double-tan form. |
| dc, dq | Depth factors | - | Reward embedment. |
| sc, sq, sg | Shape factors | - | Reward compact plans. |
Explanation
Vesic shape-depth bearing superposition.
Derivation
Vesic synthesis of De Beer, Hansen and Meyerhof factors.
Step-by-Step Calculation
Follow each step to understand how the result is calculated from your inputs.
Enter phi and c
Enter B, L, Df
Read Vesic capacity
Worked Examples
See how the calculator works with different scenarios.
Scenario
phi 30, c 10, B 2, L 4, Df 1.5, gamma 18, FS 3.
Inputs
Calculation
Vesic factors lift qult to 1552 kPa, qa 517 kPa.
Result
qa = 517 kPa
Interpretation
Highest of the classical set here; settlement still to check.
Understanding Your Result
Your Result: Ultimate qult = 1552 kPa · Allowable qa = 517 kPa · Factors Nq Nc Ng = 18.4 / 30.1 / 20.1 -
Typical range: qa 200 to 550 kPa on good ground.
What This Means
Bearing capacity on the most-used modern factors.
Why It Matters
Software defaults to Vesic; hand checks should match.
Professional Interpretation
Tabulate Terzaghi, Meyerhof, Hansen and Vesic side by side.
Recommendations
- •Pair every strength with its water content and density
- •Confirm critical values with project lab testing
- •Verify one line by hand per calculation sheet
Learn — structural behaviour, deeply
The coded-standard factor set.
1 · The two equations that run every site
ΣF_y = 0
Vertical balance
Upward reactions must equal total downward load. Missing 1 kN here means a 1 kN shear error everywhere downstream.
ΣM = 0
Moment balance
Moments about ANY point must cancel. Take moments about one support to eliminate it and solve the other directly.
ΣF_x = 0
Horizontal balance
Zero for vertical-only loading — but the pin still needs checking once wind, soil or inclined loads appear.
2 · Support types — what each one can (and cannot) do
| Support | Reactions | Allows | Watch out |
|---|---|---|---|
| Roller | 1 (vertical) | Horizontal slide + rotation | Provides NO lateral restraint — pair with a pin or bracing. |
| Pin / hinge | 2 (vertical + horizontal) | Rotation only | Moment released here — detail the hinge, never weld it rigid by accident. |
| Fixed / clamped | 3 (+ moment) | Nothing (fully restrained) | Attracts large moments; settlement or temperature causes locked-in stress. |
| Propped cantilever | 3 (indeterminate ×1) | Rotation at prop | Needs compatibility (deflection = 0 at prop) — equilibrium alone is not enough. |
| Continuous (3+ supports) | 4+ (indeterminate) | Rotation over interior piers | Solve by superposition / moment distribution / software; reactions shift with stiffness. |
3 · Factor-impact table — what moves your reactions most
| Factor | Typical impact | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Load position (a/L) | Linear, dominant | Moving P toward a support shifts ~100% of P onto it. Ra = P·(L−a)/L — position matters more than span. |
| UDL intensity (w) | ∝ w·L total | Each extra 1 kN/m on a 6 m beam adds 3 kN per reaction. Self-weight alone is often 1–5 kN/m on concrete. |
| Span length (L) | ∝ L for UDL | Doubling L doubles UDL reactions and quadruples UDL moment (wL²/8). Keep spans tight where possible. |
| Overhang length (c) | ∝ c/L uplift | Uplift at the far support = P·c/L. A 2 m overhang with 10 kN on a 5 m span pulls down 4 kN — needs hold-down. |
| Fixity (pinned → fixed) | Redistributes ~10–30% | Fixed ends attract moment and shed midspan moment. Never assume fixity you have not detailed. |
| Support settlement (Δ) | 0 (det.) / large (indet.) | Determinate beams just rotate; continuous/fixed beams develop locked-in moments ≈ 3EIΔ/L². |
| Dynamic / impact | +10–100% | Static reactions must be amplified for cranes, machinery, footfall (see ASCE 7 Ch. 4, AISC DG11). |
| Load combination | × 1.2–1.6 (LRFD) | 1.2D + 1.6L + 0.5(Lr/S/R) governs most beams. Reactions for strength ≠ reactions for service checks. |
4 · Code provisions you must cite on drawings
- ASCE 7 load combinations (LRFD): 1.4D · 1.2D + 1.6L + 0.5(Lr/S/R) · 1.2D + 1.0W + 1.0L … Strength reactions use factored loads; bearing/deflection checks use service (unfactored) loads.
- ACI 318 (concrete): strength-reduction ϕ = 0.65–0.90; development/lap lengths Ch. 25; one-way shear + punching Ch. 22. Reactions feed directly into Vu ≤ ϕVn.
- AISC 360 (steel): Ch. F/G/H for moment/shear/combined; bearing at supports per J7–J8; bracing per App. 6. Connection must develop the computed reaction — a beam is only as strong as its seat.
- Eurocode basis (EN 1990): ULS 1.35G + 1.5Q; SLS G + Q (characteristic). National annexes adjust factors — confirm the project annex.
- Serviceability (all codes): live-load deflection ≈ L/360 floors, L/240 roofs; total ≈ L/240. Vibration: AISC DG11 / SCI P354 for rhythmic or office floors.
5 · Pro workflow (5 minutes per beam)
- Sketch the free-body diagram: every load incl. self-weight, every support, dimensions.
- Solve ΣM then ΣF — write both lines on the calc sheet so a checker can follow.
- Verify: re-take moments about the OTHER support; residual must be ≈ 0.
- Draw shear then moment (reactions are the SFD starting values).
- Size the support: bearing stress, padstone, bolt/weld group, foundation pressure.
- File: keep the input → reaction → SFD/BMD → support chain on one page.
6 · Field traps (where reactions go wrong)
- • Forgetting self-weight: a 300×600 concrete beam weighs 4.5 kN/m — on 6 m that is 13.5 kN per support.
- • Assuming fixity: a “fixed” sketch with two bolts is a pin. Model what you detail.
- • Ignoring uplift: overhang + wind can reverse a bearing — light roofs lift off.
- • Mixing factored/service: never compare a factored reaction against an allowable soil pressure.
- • Point load at the wrong station: 0.5 m error on a 10 kN load swings reactions by P·Δa/L.
7 · The 3-check rule (sign-off standard)
- Math check: ΣFy and ΣM both close to zero with project units printed.
- Sanity check: reactions sum to total load; heavier side sits under heavier load; UDL symmetry gives Ra ≈ Rb.
- Load-path check: every reaction lands on something sized for it — beam → seat → column → footing → soil, no floating numbers.
Practical Tips
- •Split dead vs live early — factoring depends on it
- •Include self-weight; concrete often dominates
- •Report service values to 1 decimal for bearings and footings
Common Mistakes
Assumptions
This calculator makes the following assumptions to provide estimates:
Limitations
Be aware of these limitations when using this calculator:
Frequently Asked Questions
Answers to common questions about this calculator.
Vesic vs Hansen?
Which theory governs?
Is this final?
How do I find reactions for a simply supported beam?
What does a negative (downward) reaction mean?
Do I include the beam self-weight?
Service vs factored loads — which do I report?
What is the difference between a UDL and a UVL?
How do I turn a floor area load into a beam line load?
What is tributary area?
Which load combination usually governs a beam?
LRFD vs ASD — does it change the reactions?
Pin, roller or fixed — how do I choose the support model?
What deflection limits apply to beams?
How do I convert kN ↔ kips and m ↔ ft?
Shear vs bending moment — which sizes what?
Where does the maximum moment occur?
What is section modulus and how do I use it?
How do I quickly check a steel beam?
How do I quickly check a concrete beam?
What is development length and why does it matter?
Related Calculators
Explore more calculators related to this topic.
Glossary
Technical terms used in mortgage calculations explained in plain language.
- Reaction
- Force (or moment) a support exerts on a member to maintain static equilibrium (ΣF = 0, ΣM = 0).
- Simply supported
- Beam on one pin + one roller. Resists vertical load; allows rotation and (at roller) horizontal movement.
- Fixed support
- Clamped end resisting force AND moment; prevents rotation. Used in cantilevers and fixed frames.
- UDL / UVL
- Uniformly distributed load (constant kN/m) vs. uniformly varying load (triangular, zero-to-max).
- Tributary area
- Floor/roof area whose load drains to one member. Line load = area load × tributary width.
- Factored load
- Service load × LRFD load factor (e.g. 1.2D + 1.6L) for strength design per ASCE 7.
- Serviceability
- Deflection, cracking and vibration limits under day-to-day (unfactored) loads.
- Uplift
- Net downward-hold requirement: a negative (downward-pulling) reaction, common on overhangs.
Authoritative References
Trusted sources and standards referenced by this calculator.
Applicable Standards
Was This Calculator Helpful?
Page Information
2026-09-28
2.0.0
Free to use for educational and professional purposes.